  |
| ISSN |
| Print: 2227-0892 |
| Online: 2617-8966 |
| TEMPLATES & FORMS |
| Manuscript Template |
| Copyright Agreement Form |
| GUIDELINES |
| For Authors |
| For Reviewers |
| For Editors |
| ABSTRACTING & INDEXING |
| EMBASE |
| Google Scholar |
| Crossref |
| Scilit |
| VISITOR STATISTICS |
| |
Editorial Guidelines
The editorial work of the National Journal of Neurology is guided by a commitment to careful judgment, academic integrity, and respect for the scholarly community it serves. These guidelines set out the general approach followed by the editorial team in handling submissions and preparing material for publication.
Editorial oversight
Responsibility for the journal’s content rests with the editor-in-chief and the editorial board. Manuscripts are considered on their own merits, with attention to their contribution to neurological research and clinical knowledge. Decisions are made independently, without external influence, and are based on a balanced reading of the work and the opinions offered during peer review.
Suitability of submissions
The journal considers manuscripts that address topics within neurology and closely related fields. Submissions are expected to present original work or offer a meaningful synthesis of existing knowledge. Papers that fall outside the journal’s scope or do not meet basic scholarly expectations are not taken forward for review.
Assessment and review
Each manuscript that passes an initial editorial check is sent for peer review. Reviewers are selected for their familiarity with the subject matter and are asked to provide clear, reasoned assessments. The editorial team takes these reports seriously, though it does not rely on them mechanically; decisions are reached through careful consideration of both the reviewers’ comments and the editors’ own evaluation.
Where reports differ significantly, further opinion may be sought. In all cases, the aim is to reach a fair and well-grounded decision rather than a rapid one.
Impartiality
The journal seeks to treat all submissions in an even-handed manner. Consideration is given to the content of the work rather than to the identity or background of the authors. Editors and reviewers are expected to withdraw from the process if they feel that a conflict of interest may affect their judgment.
Confidential handling of manuscripts
Submitted manuscripts are regarded as confidential documents. They are shared only with those directly involved in the editorial and review process. Material under consideration should not be used or cited by editors or reviewers prior to publication.
Ethical considerations
Authors are expected to present their work honestly and with appropriate acknowledgment of sources. The journal does not accept plagiarism, fabricated data, or other forms of misconduct. Where research involves patients or human participants, authors should make clear that proper ethical approval has been obtained.
If concerns arise at any stage, the editorial team will look into the matter and, where necessary, seek clarification from the authors or their institutions. Outcomes may include revision, rejection, or, in the case of published work, formal correction.
Authorship
Only those who have made a substantial contribution to the work should be listed as authors. All authors should have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript. Contributions that do not meet the threshold for authorship may be acknowledged separately.
Conflicts of interest
Any interests that could be seen to influence the work should be disclosed. This applies to authors, reviewers, and editors alike. Transparency in this regard helps maintain confidence in the review and publication process.
Decisions and revisions
Authors are informed of editorial decisions along with relevant comments from reviewers. When revisions are requested, authors are expected to respond to the points raised and to indicate how the manuscript has been changed. Revised submissions may be returned for further review where appropriate.
After publication
The journal recognizes that the published record may occasionally require amendment. Where errors are identified, or where concerns are raised about the integrity of a paper, the editorial team will take steps to address the issue. This may involve issuing a correction or, in more serious cases, withdrawing the article.
Ongoing practice
Editorial procedures are reviewed from time to time in light of experience and developments in academic publishing. The journal remains open to feedback from contributors and readers and regards such input as part of its continued development.
